Politic<span id="more-20431"></span>s and Gambling 2015: Match Made in Heaven or Arranged Marriage?

Politics and gambling were front and center into the 2015 landscape. Hillary Clinton is the favorite to end up being the Democrat nominee for the 2016 presidential election, and her stance on gaming remains a bit murky.

Politics and gambling are very similar in theory. Both involve strategizing and calculating, using odds into account, and deciding how to continue in the most useful interest of an individual’s self.

When it comes to politicians addressing the presssing issue of gambling, the subject becomes a bit more complicated. Lawmakers understand that casinos bring the risk of increased tax revenues that translate to extra monies that could fund state governments that are currently struggling to create ends meet.

Republicans and Democrats seldom acknowledge anything in today’s divisive climate that is political and whenever it comes to gambling, these hardened foes aren’t exactly sure where to stand. Perhaps because online gaming, in particular, is neither liberal nor conservative, but a small amount of each, there isn’t any cut that is clear, regardless of your celebration or viewpoint.

With all that in mind,we have a appearance right back on this year that is past struggles with politics and gambling, and what seems to lie ahead in 2016.

The Race for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

It is shaping up to be Hillary Clinton versus the GOP that is still-uncertain nominee November. Whether it’s Donald Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, Florida Senator Marco Rubio or any other Republican candidate, a very important factor is almost for several, and that is Clinton will be their opponent.

Hillary Clinton

Hillary’s past in regards to gambling is just a bag that is rather mixed. Then-New York Senator Clinton voted in favor associated with illegal Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006, a bill that essentially made online betting illegal.

However, couple of years later on, Clinton said she was in favor of investigating how gambling that is online be properly regulated. The front that is democratic hasn’t addressed the emerging concerns of daily fantasy sports (DFS) as of yet.

Donald Trump

The surprising GOP leader is unsurprisingly perhaps gambling’s best bet for expansion of casinos, both land-based and online. Being a former casino owner himself, the Donald is likely to do small or nothing to block any federal legislation that will restrict states’ rights from deciding unique gaming legislation.

Marco Rubio

Rubio has issued views that are rather contrasting gambling. The senator that is first-term the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in 2015, a bill that would outlaw all kinds of on the web gambling.

However, he also hinted this October that RAWA might need an amendment for online club player casino bonus codes 2018 poker, as it has elements of ability, but he is remained steadfast against expanding gambling at land-based venues.

Dr. Ben Carson

The previous Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon has remained quiet regarding the issue of gambling, and since he doesn’t have political or gambling background, his record is vacant.

Speaker Paul Ryan

Though home Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) isn’t an advocate for gambling or online casinos, he isn’t necessarily against the marketplace. The congressman that is nine-term not to vote on UIGEA in 2006 as well as decided to go with never to sign RAWA even though 21 of his Republican peers did.

Usually the one concern with Ryan among gambling supporters is he’s employed Dave Hoppe as his chief of staff. Hoppe is a Washington, DC, lobbyist who has worked on behalf of billionaire Sheldon Adelson.

Sheldon’s Crusade

No guy had been more active in 2015 gambling that is political than billionaire and long-time GOP supporter Sheldon Adelson. The Las Vegas Sands chairman is no stranger to politics or Congress, and definitely knows what the expression ‘money talks’ is all about.

Worth approximately $30 billion, Sheldon’s made it his individual mission to ban online gambling enterprises simply by using their governmental clout among GOP lawmakers to push RAWA in the Senate and House of Representatives.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) obliged and introduced the bill to their particular chambers, though it’s generated little action. Don’t expect RAWA to magically disappear completely anytime quickly, the billionaire saying he’ll spend ‘whatever it will take’ to cease Internet gambling. But it does not appear to be threatening the shutdown of the three appropriate states, either.

2016 will be an important year perhaps not just due to the impending presidential election, but in part because of the rise of daily fantasy contests. The return of PokerStars to nj-new jersey will also bring added attention to online gaming.

RAWA in 2015: The Long and Winding Road That Led to Confusion and Contention

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is funding the RAWA journey, and although the legislation idled in 2015, the excursion will continue after the latest Year. (Image: politico.com)

RAWA endured a lengthy 2015 campaign when the legislation that aims to block all forms of online gambling failed to get momentum that is much Congress, despite several lawmakers advocating on its behalf.

Formally known as the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was initially introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives in March of 2014 by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

The bill was mostly overshadowed in Washington, DC, during its initial introduction as elected leaders inside the Beltway were focused on the so-called ‘cromnibus,’ a head-scratching emergency bill that fundamentally funded the US federal government in 2015.

Graham and Chaffetz reportedly attempted to slide RAWA into the cromnibus package, but the bill finally passed free of any gambling legislation.

RAWA’s beat in 2014 did not hamper its proponents’ inspiration for this present year’s legislative calendar. Supported by billionaire Sheldon Adelson, the $30 billion vegas Sands owner whom desperately wants online casinos outlawed, Graham and Chaffetz when again introduced the proposal for their chambers.

Chaffetz’s Hearing Help

Carrying out a February presentation of RAWA, Chaffetz used his sitting on the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations to put on a formal hearing on the good qualities and cons of delivering Internet betting into prohibition.

The committee invited five witnesses to testify, but it absolutely was evident right away the majority was at favor of RAWA. University of Illinois Law Professor John Kindt even stole a relative line directly from Adelson when he stated, ‘Click your phone, lose your house … click your mouse, lose your house.’

Just What little coverage the RAWA hearing received was rather negative, media pundits determining the bias among the invitees. That led to Chaffetz finally failing continually to gain much help from his home peers, RAWA basically being shelved into the aftermath.

Graham’s Bad Timing

Timing is everything, and Graham’s decision to re-enter RAWA to the Senate came at what was perhaps probably the most ill-advised time the South Carolina politician could have chosen.

On the day before nine victims of the Charleston, South Carolina, shooting had been set to rest, Graham quietly reintroduced RAWA.

Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas condemned the action saying, ‘I think I speak for most Americans when I express profound disappointment in Senator Graham for choosing this time to advance a bill for the sole good thing about a billionaire political donor.’

Graham’s bill has sat quietly ever since, attracting more dust into the halls regarding the US Capitol than White House fourth-tier china.

The DFS Factor

RAWA is thought to have predominantly struggled in 2014 and much of the previous 12 months because the subject of online gambling simply wasn’t relevant enough for middle-of-the-road politicians to tackle. But which may have changed now, thanks to day-to-day fantasy sports (DFS).

DFS was already outlawed by Nevada and New York, and numerous other states are currently pondering the legality of the contests. Should Congress intervene, that could theoretically open the floodgates for additional anti-online gaming regulations.

In Memorium, Nearly

Finally, both a House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) meeting on Dec. 9th and a failure (once once again) to incorporate RAWA within an end-of-year spending bill implies that RAWA may live to see another day in 2016, but most likely it’ll be gasping for breathing and on A adelson-funded heart-lung machine.

The 2015 On Line Gambling State-by-State Review: Countless Talk, Not Much Action

On the web gambling was once again a topic that is active state and federal lawmakers, so that as the discourse continues, billionaire Sheldon Adelson continues his efforts to fight it off. (Image: Jeff Scheid/Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Online gambling earned lots of floor time in state capitols around the world’s 50 states in 2015.

The movement ended up being fueled by a select few who believe legalizing Internet betting could provide substantial revenue increases for state tasks while also protecting citizens and adolescents from accessing rogue overseas sites. These legislators then persuaded colleagues to start an ear.

On the reverse side associated with issue was effective Las vegas, nevada casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson funding political action committees and pressuring federal lawmakers to stop the market that is growing.

The dubious subject of ending prohibition that is online 47 of the 50 states had been often discussed, but never caused it to be out from the park. Here’s a state-by-state recap of just what happened over the final 12 months.

Who Did What

California: The Golden State would offer a beneficial boost to on-line poker and Internet gambling, but America’s many populated state idled regarding its passage in 2015. Several bills were introduced, nonetheless a complicated battlefield between lawmakers, Native Americans, and racetracks resulted in deadlock.

Pennsylvania: The Keystone State seems poised to become the fourth state with legalized iGambling in 2016. Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the Republican-controlled legislature might need to legalize in order to combat Democrat Governor Tom Wolf’s increased investing.

Texas: The sun seems to be rising regarding gambling that is online the state for which poker’s most popular game was called. In late October, the Texas lottery reached out to Delaware to find out more about its market. Congressman Joe Barton (R) has long been in favor of legalizing iPoker, and it seems to be gaining energy.

Massachussetts: No state did more regarding gambling at land-based casinos in 2015 than Massachusetts. The Plainridge Park Casino opened in and the MGM Springfield and Wynn Everett are under construction june. But on line gambling stays a no-go for the time being.

New Hampshire: In April, state lawmakers heavily shot down yet another bill to authorize casinos that are land-based. iPoker fans in the ‘Live Free or Die’ state have little to be stoked up about, charitable poker games even drawing scrutiny in 2015.

Wisconsin: Badgers will continue waiting to try out poker outside a Wisconsin judge upholding the state’s poker ban by citing a 1964 ruling.

Michigan: The Spartan State has a history that is long of gambling, but that’s not the way it is with online casinos. A Michigan State University study found that the state would benefit from legalizing the industry, but lawmakers have been weary to continue.

Nevada and Delaware: Two states that legalized online gaming before 2015, Nevada and Delaware attempted to breathe life into their struggling iPoker companies by formally releasing a compact that is interstate. The pact hasn’t solved the nagging issues of player liquidity as hoped, but.

Florida: The Sunshine State has long been targeted by commercial casino operators for its high population of seniors, but elected leaders have repeatedly knocked straight down efforts to reduce the monopoly on gaming native tribes possess. On line gambling seems to be an even longer shot for passage.

New Jersey: The only other state with Nevada and Delaware to provide legal and regulated online gaming, New Jersey has its market placed for a monstrous 2016 after it granted PokerStars an operating permit in late September. The Garden State is also attempting to legalize sports that are traditional, a lawsuit set to be heard in February of next year.

Brand New York: The Empire State was running towards its authorization that is own of gambling in 2015 until daily fantasy sports (DFS) exploded. With numerous bills presented, all gaming legislation took a back seat once New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman pressed to make DFS illegal in his state. Which brings us to…